Because GitVersion works with several workflows, the way it does its version incrementing may work perfectly for you, or it may cause you issues. This page is split up into two sections, first is all about understanding the approach GitVersion uses by default, and the second is how you can manually increment the version.
Approach
Semantic Versioning is all about releases, not commits or
builds. This means that the version only increases after you
release, this directly conflicts with the concept of published CI
builds. When you release the next version of your
library/app/website/whatever you should only increment major/minor
or patch then reset all lower parts to 0, for instance given
1.0.0, the next release should be either
2.0.0, 1.1.0 or 1.0.1.
Because of this, GitVersion works out what the next SemVer of your
app is on each commit. When you are ready to release, you simply
deploy the latest built version and tag the commit it was created
from. This practice is called
continuous delivery. GitVersion will increment the metadata for each commit
so you can tell them apart. For example
1.0.0+5 followed by 1.0.0+6. It is
important to note that build metadata
is not part of the semantic version; it is just metadata!.
All this effectively means that GitVersion will produce the same version NuGet package each commit until you tag a release.
This causes problems for people as NuGet and other package managers do not support multiple packages with the same version where only the metadata is different. There are a few ways to handle this problem depending on what your requirements are:
1. GitFlow
If you are using GitFlow then builds off the
develop branch will actually
increment on every commit. This is known in GitVersion as
continuous deployment mode. By default
develop builds are tagged with the
alpha pre-release tag. This is so they are sorted
higher than release branches.
If you need to consume packages built from develop, we
recommend publishing these packages to a separate NuGet feed as an
alpha channel. That way you can publish beta/release candidate
builds and only people who opt into the alpha feed will see the
alpha packages.
2. Octopus deploy
See Octopus deploy
Manually incrementing the version
With v3 there are multiple approaches. Read about these below.
Commit messages
Adding +semver: breaking or
+semver: major will cause the major version to be
increased, +semver: feature or
+semver: minor will bump minor and
+semver: patch or +semver: fix will bump
the patch.
Configuration
The feature is enabled by default but can be disabled via configuration, the regex we use can be changed:
major-version-bump-message: '\+semver:\s?(breaking|major)'
minor-version-bump-message: '\+semver:\s?(feature|minor)'
patch-version-bump-message: '\+semver:\s?(fix|patch)'
commit-message-incrementing: Enabled
The options for commit-message-incrementing are
Enabled, MergeMessageOnly and
Disabled
If the incrementing mode is set to
MergeMessageOnly you can add this information when
merging a pull request. This prevents commits within a PR to bump
the version number.
Conventional commit messages
If you want to use the Conventional Commits standard, you can leverage this feature as follows:
mode: MainLine # Only add this if you want every version to be created automatically on your main branch.
major-version-bump-message: "^(build|chore|ci|docs|feat|fix|perf|refactor|revert|style|test)(\\([\\w\\s-,/\\\\]*\\))?(!:|:.*\\n\\n((.+\\n)+\\n)?BREAKING CHANGE:\\s.+)"
minor-version-bump-message: "^(feat)(\\([\\w\\s-,/\\\\]*\\))?:"
patch-version-bump-message: "^(fix|perf)(\\([\\w\\s-,/\\\\]*\\))?:"
This will ensure that your version gets bumped according to the commits you've created.
If your CI/CD workflow uses semantic-release's commit-analyzer,
change (fix|perf) to (fix|perf|revert).
Why?
Alternatively, you can override this rule in the configuration of @semantic-release/commit-analyzer. If you intend to write rules with patterns, note that instead of using Regular Expression, @semantic-release/commit-analyzer uses micromatch's glob implementation.
GitVersion.yml
The first is by setting the next-version property in
the GitVersion.yml file. This property only serves as a base
version,
Branch name
If you create a branch with the version number in the branch name,
such as release-1.2.0 or hotfix/1.0.1 then
GitVersion will take the version number from the branch name as a
source. However, GitVersion can't use the
branch name as a version source for other branches.
Detached HEAD
If HEAD is in detached state tag will be -no-branch-.
Example: 0.0.1--no-branch-.1+4
Tagging commit
By tagging a commit, GitVersion will use that tag for the version of that commit, then increment the next commit automatically based on the increment rules for that branch (some branches bump patch, some minor).
Be aware that tags are local to a repository and will not be
transferred when you perform a default git push.
Instead, tags can be pushed separately with their own command. For
more information, read the
git documentation on tagging.
Incrementing per commit
When using the continuous deployment mode (which will
increment the SemVer every commit) all builds must have a
pre-release tag, except for builds that are explicitly tagged as
stable.
Then the build metadata (which is the commit count) is promoted to the pre-release tag. Applying these rules, the above commit-graph would produce:
e137e9 -> 1.0.0+0
a5f6c5 -> 1.0.1-ci.1
adb29a -> 1.0.1-feature-foo.1 (PR #5 Version: `1.0.1-PullRequest.5+2`)
7c2438 -> 1.0.1-feature-foo.2 (PR #5 Version: `1.0.1-PullRequest.5+3`)
5f413b -> 1.0.1-ci.4
d6155b -> 2.0.0-rc.1+4 (Before and after tag)
d53ab6 -> 2.0.0-rc.2 (If there was another commit on the release branch it would be 2.0.0-rc.3)
b5d142 -> 2.0.0-ci.0 (2.0.0 branch was merged, so main is now at 2.0.0)
As you can see, the versions now no longer conflict. When you want
to create a stable 2.0.0 release you simply
git tag 2.0.0, then build the tag, and it will produce
a stable 2.0.0 package. Be aware that
tags are not transferred with git push
For more information/background on why we have come to this conclusion, read Xavier Decoster's blog post on the subject.